breast cancer

logo.jpg (8393 bytes)
Informatie gids over kanker

 

Breast cancer


Mammografie niet altijd zonder risico's

Het preventief controlen op borstkanker is niet geheel zonder risico's doordat men juist door het gebruik van gamma stralen ook kanker kan gaan ontwikkelen. Dit verhaal is in het Engels maar toch zeer de moeite waard. Lijkt een beetje op de bijwerkingen van een chemotherapie waarbij het immuunsysteem (met name de voorraad anti-oxydanten) flink te leiden heeft met als gevolg een zeer verzwakt immuunsysteem met alle gevolgen van dien.

However, there is growing evidence that mammograms which, like any x-ray, involve zapping the patient with radiation can be positively harmful and even cause the disease they are intended to detect. A Canadian study, which has yet to be published in full, seems set to confirm the findings of earlier research which clearly suggests that you are more likely to die from cancer if you undergo screening than if you don't.

The Canadian study, using the National Breast Cancer Screening Trial, is examining the effect of mammography on women under 50. Data released so far suggests that women whose cancer was detected through mammograms have a shorter life expectancy than those who used self examination alone.

Such concerns are far from new. As long ago as the early 1980s, the late Dr Robert Mendelsohn, in Male Practice, How Doctors Manipulate Women (Contemporary Books, Chicago, 1982), wrote: "I have been warning for years that annual mammographic screening of women without symptoms may produce more cancer than it detects." Mendelsohn quoted Dr C Bailar III, editor in chief of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, as making the same point in a 1975 report. "His conclusion was supported by numerous studies, which suggested that accumulated x-ray doses in excess of 100 rads over 10 to 15 years may induce cancer of the breast," said Mendelsohn.

Klik hier voor het volledige artikel


Onderzoek naar effect MRT straling op borstkanker cellen

In-Vitro Studies Show MRT Anti-Cancer (Human Breast Cancer) Properties

Foundation for Jacobson Resonance (FJR) -- Experimental in-vitro studies at the College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, have revealed anti-cancer properties of MRT, with select
field-schedules, in human mammary carcinoma cell populations.

Foundation for Jacobson Resonance (FJR) -- Experimental in-vitro studies at the College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, have revealed anti-cancer properties of MRT, with select field-schedules, in human mammary carcinoma cell populations.

Ten million times weaker than the earth’s steady magnetic field, millions of times weaker than those magnetic fields emitted by power lines, cellular telephones and computers, these fields are apparently
physiologic. Now, we have evidence that they do play a vital role in the structure and function of the state of well being in humans. Three energy field schedules (MRT signals) utilizing the Jacobson Resonator,
consistently suppressed the proliferation rate/viability of neoplastic (cancer) cells in-vitro.

Subsequent studies led by Principal Investigator Dr. Cody Coyne at Mississippi State University, have detected a range of biological proteins -- produced by breast cancer cell types -- have had their profiles
altered following exposure to the same schedules used in the gene studies, referenced above.

Dr. Coyne states: “Investigations have identified membrane associated complexes that are expressed at elevated or decreased levels in MCF-7 populations following exposure to specific multi-frequency pico-Tesla electromagnetic energy field schedules. Investigations have also detected several mRNA sequences that are expressed in populations of MCF-7 human mammary carcinoma cells following exposure to the same schedules that consistently suppressed the proliferation rate/viability of MCF-7 cell populations.” It is our intent to publish these experimental findings in the near future.

Dr. Jacobson offers: “We look upon these findings as critically important. Indeed, we have identified genes and proteins that are probably involved in suppressing growth and viability of human breast cancer cells that can be regulated non-invasively. Furthermore, the genes and proteins identified may serve as “targets” that can function as templates for the design of new chemotherapeutic agents, and MRT may potentially serve as a viable adjunctive modality to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. And. finally, MRT instrumentation can be applied as a research tool for further scientific discovery as we seek to palliate human suffering.”

For further information please contact Harvey Grossman, Founder & President of the Foundation for Jacobson Resonance at 1.877.439.0514 in North America, and at 561.208.1775 from outside North
America. For charitable contributions only, call 561.208.1775


Ginseng and breastcancer

We evaluated the anticancer effect of a range of ginseng compounds in varying doses by adding these compounds to the media in which the breast cancer cells were grown. When the cancer cells were exposed to the ginsenosides in a six-day assay, none of the ginsenosides enhanced the growth of the cells, but the crude fraction we have designated as PQe not only inhibited proliferation of the cancer cells at all doses but actually caused significant tumor cell death when administered at high doses. In a ten-day assay, one ginsenoside (Rc) enhanced the proliferation of the cancer cells, but all other ginsenosides were either neutral or inhibitory. Again, PQe had the greatest inhibitory effect: after 10 days, the number of cancer cells had been reduced by 98% compared to control cell cultures.

Meer hier


Breast Brachytherapy

Breast tumors are often treated with a combination of tumor removal followed by external beam radiotherapy to the whole breast. This has been found in several studies to result in the same cure rate as total breast removal. Sadly, only one third or so of women choose to keep their breast. One of the reasons for this low number may be that the external radiotherapy can take as long as 7 weeks to give, and this can be too much time away from home or work for some women.
Since 1998, Cancer Treatment Centers of America has had a treatment program which uses 5 days of partial breast brachytherapy (temporary radiation implant) instead of 5 - 7 weeks of external beam radiotherapy. This shorter time period is a great benefit to all patients, but especially working women, those who live far away from a radiation treatment center, and those who just want to get the treatment over with as quickly as possible.

The brachytherapy procedure involves placing some flexible plastic catheters (tiny tubes) into the breast. The procedure is performed by a board-certified radiation oncologist (Dr. Kelly or Dr. Flynn), and is done under ultrasound guidance. Nine times over the following 5 days, the catheters are briefly connected to our high-dose-rate brachytherapy machine for an internal radiation treatment through the catheters. These treatments take about 15 minutes each and are painless. On Friday, the catheters are easily removed, and you will be able to go home on the same day. During the 5 days of treatment you will be an out-patient and may stay in a guest room in the building. You will not be radioactive, and can do most of your usual activities during that period. We have nutrition classes and other activities available during the week.

Meer hier

Brachytherapie ook in Nederland? Kijk hier


Artificial Light at Night Stimulates Breast Cancer Growth in Laboratory Mice

Results from a new study in laboratory mice show that nighttime exposure to artificial light stimulated the growth of human breast tumors by suppressing the levels of a key hormone called melatonin. The study also showed that extended periods of nighttime darkness greatly slowed the growth of these tumors.

The study results might explain why female night shift workers have a higher rate of breast cancer. It also offers a promising new explanation for the epidemic rise in breast cancer incidence in industrialized countries like the United States.

The National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, agencies of the federal National Institutes of Health, provided funding to researchers at the Bassett Research Institute of the Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital in Cooperstown, New York and The Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, Pa. The results are published in the December 1, 2005 issue of the scientific journal Cancer Research.

"This is the first experimental evidence that artificial light plays an integral role in the growth of human breast cancer," said NIEHS Director David A. Schwartz, M.D. "This finding will enable scientists to develop new strategies for evaluating the effects of light and other environmental factors on cancer growth."

"The risk of developing breast cancer is about five times higher in industrialized nations than it is in underdeveloped countries," said Les Reinlib, Ph.D., a program administrator with the NIEHS' grants division. "These results suggest that the increasing nighttime use of electric lighting, both at home and in the workplace, may be a significant factor."

Previous research showed that artificial light suppresses the brain's production of melatonin, a hormone that helps to regulate a person's sleeping and waking cycles. The new study shows that melatonin also plays a key role in the development of cancerous tumors.

"We know that many tumors are largely dependent on a nutrient called linoleic acid, an essential fatty acid, in order to grow," said David Blask, M.D., Ph.D., a neuroendocrinologist with the Bassett Research Institute and lead author on the study. "Melatonin interferes with the tumor's ability to use linoleic acid as a growth signal, which causes tumor metabolism and growth activity to shut down."

To test this hypothesis, the researchers injected human breast cancer cells into laboratory mice. Once these cells developed into cancerous tumors, the tumors were implanted into female rats where they could continue to grow and develop.

The researchers then took blood samples from 12 healthy, premenopausal volunteers. The samples were collected under three different conditions - during the daytime, during the nighttime following 2 hours of complete darkness, and during the nighttime following 90 minutes of exposure to bright fluorescent light. These blood samples were then pumped directly through the developing tumors.

"The melatonin-rich blood collected from subjects while in total darkness severely slowed the growth of the tumors. "These results are due to a direct effect of the melatonin on the cancer cells," said Blask. "The melatonin is clearly suppressing tumor development and growth."

In contrast, tests with the melatonin-depleted blood from light-exposed subjects stimulated tumor growth. "We observed rapid growth comparable to that seen with administration of daytime blood samples, when tumor activity is particularly high," Blask said.

According to the researchers, melatonin exerts a strong influence on the body's circadian rhythm, an internal biological clock that regulates sleep-wake cycle, body temperature, endocrine functions, and a number of disease processes including heart attack, stroke and asthma. "Evidence is emerging that disruption of one's circadian clock is associated with cancer in humans, and that interference with internal timekeeping can tip the balance in favor of tumor development," said Blask.

"The effects we are seeing are of greatest concern to people who routinely stay in a lighted environment during times when they would prefer to be sleeping," said Mark Rollag, Ph.D., a visiting research scientist at the University of Virginia and one of the study co-authors. "This is because melatonin concentrations are not elevated during a person's normal waking hours."

"If the link between light exposure and cancer risk can be confirmed, it could have an immediate impact on the production and use of artificial lighting in this country," said Blask. "This might include lighting with a wavelength and intensity that does not disrupt melatonin levels and internal timekeeping."

"Day workers who spend their time indoors would benefit from lighting that better mimics sunlight," added Blask. "Companies that employ shift workers could introduce lighting that allows the workers to see without disrupting their circadian and melatonin rhythms."

Source: http://www.niehs.nih.gov


TAMOXIFEN APPROVED FOR REDUCING BREAST CANCER INCIDENCE

The Food and Drug Administration today announced the approval of Nolvadex (tamoxifen citrate), for reducing the incidence of breast cancer in women at high risk for developing the disease. This new indication for tamoxifen, which has been used as a breast cancer treatment for more than 20 years, resulted from a recent study of the drug, conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), in women who were judged to be at increased risk of breast cancer. The study showed that tamoxifen reduced the chance of getting breast cancer by 44 percent. The data also showed that tamoxifen treatment did not completely eliminate breast cancer risk, and that its longer term effects are not known.
"Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American women and accounts for 31 percent of all cancers among women. Today's action provides an important new option for some women at heightened risk of breast cancer." said HHS Secretary Donna E. Shalala.

In approving the drug for this new indication, FDA emphasizes that Nolvadex should be prescribed only for women at high risk for breast cancer following a medical evaluation of a woman's individual risk factors including age, personal health history and family history of breast cancer -- factors outlined in the approved labeling.

The agency notes that caution must be used in prescribing the drug because of its potentially serious side effects including endometrial cancer (cancer of the lining of the uterus), deep vein thrombosis (blood clots in major veins), and pulmonary embolism (serious blood clots in the lungs).

"As with all drugs, there are risks associated with use. As valuable as tamoxifen is to some patients, FDA strongly advises women and their doctors to carefully weigh the benefits and risks of tamoxifen before patients use the drug," said Dr. Michael A. Friedman, Acting FDA Commissioner.

The NCI study used a computerized model, called the "Gail model", for assessing a woman's risk of breast cancer. Recognizing that not all health care providers have access to this computer model, the manufacturer will provide materials to calculate risk. The FDA has also required that labeling provide information for doctors to help them identify women who should receive the drug:

For example, the labeling specifies that for women age 50 or older, the following risk factors would result in an increased risk of breast cancer:

Family history of breast cancer (at least two direct line relatives with breast cancer); personal health history (Presence of atypical hyperplasia on breast biopsy);  Had first child at age 30 or older; and sarted menstruating at age 11 or younger. Today's approval of the new indication for tamoxifen was based on the NCI study of more than 13,000 patients which was conducted by one of NCI's national clinical trials networks called the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). The trial was halted 14 months early, in March l998, when interim results showed that tamoxifen reduced breast cancer incidence by almost one half.

FDA's decision is in keeping with the FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee recommendation, in September 1998, that tamoxifen be approved for high risk women for the reduction in the incidence of breast cancer. FDA will also require that adequate patient follow-up to determine the extent of the benefits and risks of long term use and emphasized that physicians and patients should be given educational information about the drug's potential benefits and risks.

The manufacturer, Zeneca Pharmaceutical, Inc. of Wilmington, Del., submitted a supplemental new drug application for tamoxifen's new use on April 30 and at that time, FDA committed to a six-month review.


FDA CLEARS NEW DEVICE FOR RADIATION TREATMENT FOR BREAST CANCER

FDA today cleared a new medical device that provides another option for radiation treatment for women who have had a cancerous lump removed from their breast (lumpectomy).

The device, a brachytherapy applicator, is designed to irradiate the surgical site from which the lump has been removed, with minimal irradiation of the surrounding tissue. (Brachytherapy is radiation treatment in which the source of radiation is close to the area being treated.)

The new device is the MammoSite Radiation Therapy System, made by Proxima Therapeutics, Inc., of Alpharetta, Ga. It consists of a hollow catheter to which an inflatable balloon it attached.

The device is implanted into the breast at the site of the lumpectomy, and the balloon is inflated. A radioactive source is then placed into the catheter. The balloon acts to center the radiation source within the wound. After a series of treatments are completed--typically over several days--the catheter is removed.

The device is intended to be used primarily to treat breast cancer in its early stages when there is no need to remove the whole breast. It does not replace whole breast irradiation in women who need that treatment.

FDA cleared the device based on information that showed it was comparable in safety and effectiveness to other devices used to deliver brachytherapy to the breast and other body parts. Such information included clinical data from 25 women at eight medical centers who had the device implanted after lumpectomy. The study showed that this new method of delivering brachytherapy was relatively simple and did not create increased risk to the patient.

As a condition for clearance, FDA is requiring Proxima Therapeutics to include a warning in the product labeling that the safety and effectiveness of MammoSite as a replacement for whole breast irradiation to treat breast cancer has not been established.


Vrijwilligers gezocht

U zult begrijpen dat wij onmogelijk alles alleen kunnen doen dus mocht je willen helpen bij een bepaald thema, vertaalwerk, links bezoeken etc dan is alle hulp welkom.

Mvg

Ron Fonteine
Email adres: ugamedia@wirehub.nl


Aanmelden van nuttige links, adviezen, persoonlijke
ervaringen mbt kanker etc

Naam
Email

Omschrijving / feedback


 

Zoeken
Thema's
Algemeen
Alvleesklierkanker
Anuskanker
Baarmoederkanker
Blaaskanker
Bloedkanker
Borstkanker
Botkanker
Darmkanker
Galkanker
Hersentumor
Huidkanker
Keelkanker
Leverkanker
Lymfeklierkanker
Longkanker
Maagkanker
Oogkanker
Nierkanker
Prostaatkanker
Schildklierkanker
Slokdarmkanker
Zaadbalkanker

Internationaal

Algemeen
Borstkanker
Darmkanker
Prostaatkanker
Voeding
Selenium
Selenium (Eng)
Vitamine C
Vitamine C (Eng)

Alternatief

Budwig
Dr Rath
Moerman
Houtsmuller
Links
Gezonde voeding
Vitamine C
Fitness gids
Supervoeding




View My Stats